Mr. Pugh,The next day, Mr. Pugh called me. He expressed to me that he had the very same questions about the parental antipathy for President Obama. He was very vague, however, about what percentage of the parent population had outwardly expressed opposition to airing President Obama's address to the students. He would only say that there was such an outcry in the fall of 2009 of angry parents threatening to keep their children home that Superintendent Alvin Wilbanks decided that Gwinnett Schools would send out permission slips. Therefore, Mr. Pugh claimed that he was acting under the directive of the superintendent. He asked me how I suggested they handle this "debacle" (my quotes not his) in the future.
I am the parent of one of your honor roll, eighth grade students. I have two children who have attended Gwinnett County Schools all of their lives (for the past 16 years). During those 16 years, we have been through four presidential administrations - two administrations with Bill Clinton and two administrations with George W. Bush. And in all of those 16 years, I have never been asked to sign a Parent Permission form to allow my children to hear and watch a Presidential Address to the nation and to the nation's children. Children in Japan watch President Obama's addresses without parental permission. In fact, his speeches are a part of the curriculum there. However, the parents of American children at Bay Creek Middle School must be "warned" or "alerted" and "consent" to have their children "subjected" to President Obama's addresses.
When I received the first permission slip last fall, I was patient yet incensed. This time, I decided to do some reasoning of my own. I first thought that maybe the controversy over Healthcare Reform was the motivation for trepidation on the part of the school system. Then, I remembered all of the controversy during the second Clinton Administration over the Lewinsky scandal, yet no permission slips. Next, I thought of all of the bipartisan hostility coupled with the fact that we live in a very "conservative" state. However, Bill Clinton was a Democrat, and at times a liberal Democrat, not well liked by the Republican party - and still no permission slips. And, of course, during both Bush Administrations, there were no permission slips to allow children to hear his Addresses.
Now, I cannot help but conclude that these permission slips are predicated on the very precarious subject of race in America. There is no other difference between President Obama and any other president of the United States except that he is the first Black man to hold the office.
Mr. Pugh, please give me another explanation for these spurious and conspicuous permission slips. I do not want to believe that Bay Creek Middle is providing parent permission slips to students in order to appease those parents who loathe Mr. Obama because they have accused him of being a socialist, a Muslim, and everything short of the anti-Christ. But more importantly, I do not want to believe that Bay Creek Middle is providing parent permission slips to students in order to assuage their parents' loathing of the first African American president simply because he is a Black man.
I hope to hear from you soon.
I told him that it was a great American tragedy that such a situation existed in the first place, and since a Civil War and the last 50 or more years of Civil Rights advocacy has not changed the hearts of many Americans, America's educational system, at least, had an obligation to use this particular moment as a teaching opportunity. The current policy of sending home permission slips was reinforcing the hate mongering and perpetuating the underlying racism rather than discouraging it - rather than confronting students and their parents and forcing them to examine the origin of their deep hatred for the 44th president of the United States of America. Instead of sounding a huge bell via a permission slip that says, this president isn't like the other 43, the school should allow dissenting parents to send their own letter on an individual basis which prohibits their students from watching any presidential address for the duration of the Obama administration. Those parents who consent need not be disturbed by the bright yellow permission slip.
Mr. Pugh took my suggestion under advisement. And of course, I am not sure what that means. I am, however, not satisfied with this encounter. I am writing a letter to Superintendent Wilbanks and the Georgia State Superintendent of Schools this week.
I just thought other citizens should know that this is the general tone regarding President Obama in Georgia schools. If they are not ashamed. I am ashamed for them.

I too believe this is an afront to not only the Presidential office, but to the man himself. This school system allows people every day to come in and speak to our children without so much as even an acknowledgement to the parents. Most of ...these people have far less character than Barack Obama. They would have no problem allowing an alcoholic, cocain addict, less than average grade-achieving college failure to speak to our children, but they have to have the explicit permission of parents to allow an upstanding, overachieving, defy all odds, pull yourself up by the boot straps (isn't that what they say America is all about) honorable man to speak possitive words to their children. It can be about one thing and one thing only..... the color of that man's skin. By the way, the alcoholic drug addict I spoke of earlier was George H. W. Bush!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteSonya, I am with you! Ii called Channel 2 and expressed my concern as well, and Jovita Moore did try to reach me for an interview, but me of course, being the parent that I am, was at my 8th grader's school when she called to conduct the interview. However, Channel 2 did follow through and do an interview with an Emory professor whe shared the same concern. Way to 2 go girl!! We have to stay on top of our lopsided community and world!!
ReplyDeleteThanks Kevin and Sheryl. This is how I plan to move forward - I have sent a letter/email to Alvin Wilbanks (Gwinnett Superintendent), the State Superintendent of Schools, and the Secretary of Education (Federal). If I don't get a response in a reasonable amount of time, I plan to send my complaints to several radio media outlets.
ReplyDelete@Sheryl - please tell me the approximate date of the Channel 2 interview with the Emory professor. I would like to see if they were just theorizing or if there was any suggested activism. My suspicions are the former.
Thank you for speaking out! I stand with you! I recall the elation I felt in 2008 when I realized that my 3 year old girls' first experience with an American President would be with Obama. Here we are two years later having to deflect all manner of hateful utterances. I am beyond livid! We can't even offer a meaningful critique of his work, because it would line up right behind all the racist slander.
ReplyDeleteThis would be good material 4 Tom Joyner and Michael Baisden. You should call them and get an e-mail address. The more national media that gets behind this the more weight it will carry. Otherwise we may just find ourselves sitting around preaching to the choir. Also it would help a lot if someone had an attorney in their pocket......legally they will be required to respond within a certain window of receiving any documents. Oprah may even want to get behind this; especially considering this is her last season. I like the actions u have taken, but i really would like to see this addressed on a national level. I'll call Kevin to discuss this more in depth, thanx 4 sharing this.
ReplyDelete