![]() |
| Michelle Obama Vogue 2009 Photo by Annie Leibovitz |
Ok, so this just occurred to me (I know. I'm late). For those of us who've been immersed in Gender and Race Studies in America, how deliciously ironic is it that the first lady is an unambiguous black woman?Several posts later, one of the commenters asked:
What do you mean by unambiguous?
To which I responded:
Unambiguous-as-in-she-coulAlthough he understood my meaning of the term "unambiguous," I had the feeling that the full meaning and implications of the post were lost on him. And if the irony was lost on him (a pretty astute, well-educated, progressive-minded guy), then quite possibly the full significance of the post had been lost on many others. The remainder of this blog post is my attempt to find what has been lost.d-not-be mistaken-for-anyone-except -a-black-woman. She couldn't be biracial or Hispanic or Asian or Indian or anything else but African/Black/Negro/Colore d.
In 2008, the entire world paused for a moment of deep reverence when America elected its first Black president. The historical, cultural, and socio-political significance of that moment was apparent to the entire global world, even though many white Americans attempted to disavow the watershed event of America electing its first African American president - America - the same country who just 145 years ago defined Africans as subhuman accidents of evolution bound to the yoke of chattel slavery irrevocably. No, this moment was not lost on anyone.
However, another watershed event simultaneously occurred when Barack Obama took the oath of the highest office in the land. Michelle Obama became the "First Lady" of the United States of America.
So, here is where I return to my Facebook post. I said that it was "deliciously ironic that the first lady is an unambiguous black woman." Here's the irony. The office of the "First Lady" (and it is an office) was, of course, constructed and shaped over the years by powerful first ladies like Dolly Madison, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Jackie Kennedy. If the President (the first man) epitomizes the power, masculinity, and patriarchy of an entire nation, then the first lady epitomizes the purity, femininity, and domesticity of that same nation. We could debate some of the latter descriptors; however, the point is that the first lady is the paradigm of Western womanhood. Historically (in spite of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd wave feminism), Western womanhood equals "white womanhood," and in 1966, Barbara Welter defined this "cult of true womanhood" as piety, purity, submissiveness, and domesticity. Although Welter was defining white womanhood in the nineteenth century, her definition lingered well into the twentieth, and I would venture to say, the twenty first century.
Historically, black womanhood was the antithesis of white womanhood. During and well after slavery, black women were defined as the binary opposites of white women. Of course these definitions were not their own. If white women were viewed as "naturally" pious, then black women were deemed "naturally" evil. If white women were pure, black women were "jezebels." If white women were submissive, black women were unpleasantly aggressive. And if white women were "naturally" domestic, black women were "naturally" cut out for hard labor and toil. Granted, there are contemporary progressives who will debunk all of this theorizing. However, these racist stereotypes, although historical relics, have found their way into contemporary American society. Just scratch the surface of any pop culture icon.
![]() |
| Michelle Obama Vogue 2009 Photo by Annie Leibovitz |
Unlike her husband, her poise, grace, intellect, and beauty cannot be accredited to any other race except African American. Not that it isn't wonderful that President Obama is biracial. In fact, I think it's absolutely fitting that the first African American president is half white and half African. And I think it doubly fitting that the first African American First Lady is unambiguously black. She has no café au lait skin or European facial or body structure. Mrs. Obama, for all intents and purposes, is a black woman - a little sugar - but no cream. Indeed, this is deliciously ironic.


I thought that you may have meant in your initial post that she was "full black", with no white parents at the very least, but I was unwilling to expound on that simply out of the fear of seeming ignorant. Plus, I don't know her ancestral lineage beyond both her parents being black, so ignorance in that aspect is a tough one for me to avoid. That said, I have often "wished" both of Obama's parents were "full black" pretty much for the "unambiguous" reasons you stated. Am I racist for wishing our first black president had no cream in his coffee, simply for what it represents to black Americans? I certainly don't want to "return" Obama in any way because I like him the way he is, but yeah, your unambiguous "revelations" are thoughts I have considered myself (especially when he actually became the Democratic candidate) more for the statement it makes about America rather than anything against the individuals being considered.
ReplyDeleteI did get thrown by the "irony" of the "first black first lady" concept, because then I got caught up in the historical basis of where the first humans came from and the DNA analyses that state every human has a common female ancestor that lived in a population found in central Africa, aka "Eve". Glad to know it wasn't ignorance that confused me (it was the concept of "first"), but I'm not necessarily proud that it was fear of looking ignorant that kept me from seeing your point clearly.
Either way, I want to go on record saying "FOUR MORE YEARS!" I'm just incredibly proud to be able to say that our current first lady is someone as admirable as Michelle Obama, and after the nightmare that was most of the 2000's, I'm glad to be able to look at my president and be proud to be an American once again. Couldn't say that for the last guy.See More
Thanks, Danny! Living in Georgia, I so seldom hear positive comments about the President Obama. This is so refreshing and validating. Re: "Eve" and the "First" in "First Lady" - that's interesting. I see how you could have interpreted my irony that way at first. "FOUR MORE YEARS!" indeed.
ReplyDelete